We have had reports of MSG-type reactions from chickens, particularly
regarding major suppliers such as Tyson and Perdue. Realizing that
there is a citric acid solution approved for rinsing chickens in the processing
procedure for chickens, and that citric acid causes reactions in MSG-sensitive
individuals with other than a high tolerance for MSG, we have suggested that
people avoid major brands of chickens and purchase organic brands or chickens
from local chicken suppliers. We have also cautioned people to only
buy chicken parts, such as breasts and thighs, that have been cut from whole
chickens at the store, since many chicken parts are delivered to markets
in bulk bags that contain trisodium phosphate. (Some MSG-sensitive
people react to phosphate as if it were processed free glutamic acid (MSG).)
Furthermore, we have suggested that MSG-sensitive people avoid all basted
or injected turkeys.
Now we have learned from a November 6, 2007 article in the Washington Post
entitled “Crying Foul in Debate Over ‘Natural’ Chicken” that there is cause
for additional concern. The article states that about 30% of fresh chickens
are now enhanced with some kind of solution, and some of those chickens
are labeled “natural.” The article, by Cindy Skrzycki, discloses that
Tyson Foods and Pilgrim’s Pride are injecting chickens with a “solution
of ingredients such as salt, broth, and seaweed extract.” According to the
article, “Pilgrim’s Pride uses chicken broth, salt, and carrageenan, or
seaweed extract.” The injected ingredients add up to 15% in weight
to the chickens. The article also discloses that Gold’n Plump Poultry,
St. Cloud, Minnesota, enhances its chickens, although the ingredients are
not disclosed in the newspaper article.
MSG-sensitive people will react to seaweed extract and carrageenan, as
well as citric acid. Also, broth used in solutions injected into poultry
may very well contain processed free glutamic acid (MSG).
The above information came to light because smaller chicken producers objected
to the fact that Tyson Foods and Pilgrim’s Pride were referring to their
injected chickens as “NATURAL.” Complaints have apparently been made
to members of the House of Representatives; and Representative Dennis Cardoza,
chairman of the House Agricultural Committee, is considering holding hearings
on the issue. However, it would appear that noone except for the Truth
in Labeling Campaign has addressed the issue that processed free glutamic
acid (MSG) is included in the solutions being injected into chickens.
As an MSG-sensitive individual, you must read the following two comments,
one from the USDA and the other from a chicken processor, which clearly
demonstrate how federal regulatory agencies and many food executives think.
Amanda Eamich, a spokeswomen for the Food and Safety Service at the USDA is quoted as saying “...the [injected natural] products are considered minimally processed because a cook can make a similar marinade at home with a fork and a plastic bag.”
Michael Helgeson, chief executive of Gold’n Plump Poultry, St. Cloud, Minnesota, is quoted as stating “We have no issue with chicken that is enhanced. But it shouldn't be labeled all-natural if you inject it with a solution.” He added that his company’s enhanced chicken is labeled “extra tender.”
Apparently it is more important to many food industry executives to
increase profits than it is to have concern for the health of our nation.
adandjack@aol.com 858/481-9333 http://www.truthinlabeling.org This page was last updated on November 11, 2007
IF MSG ISN'T HARMFUL, WHY IS IT HIDDEN?